Difference between revisions of "Probation Board of Northern Ireland"
From E-Consultation Guide
m |
m (→Overview) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===Overview=== | ===Overview=== | ||
| − | E-consultation is often criticized on the grounds that different groups of people do not have equal access to electronic communications technologies. | + | E-consultation is often criticized on the grounds that different groups of people do not have equal access to electronic communications technologies. However, in our modern times, this criticism is a weak one. |
| − | + | E-consultation techniques are complementary to traditional approaches, and seek to improve participation. | |
| − | + | In this case example we discuss what can be done to improve accessibility and usability for groups, who may be otherwise excluded from e-consultation. | |
| − | |||
| − | In this case example we discuss what can be done to improve accessibility and usability for | ||
===[[Probation Board of Northern Ireland Consultation]]=== | ===[[Probation Board of Northern Ireland Consultation]]=== | ||
Revision as of 17:32, 13 January 2008
Contents
Overview
E-consultation is often criticized on the grounds that different groups of people do not have equal access to electronic communications technologies. However, in our modern times, this criticism is a weak one.
E-consultation techniques are complementary to traditional approaches, and seek to improve participation.
In this case example we discuss what can be done to improve accessibility and usability for groups, who may be otherwise excluded from e-consultation.
Probation Board of Northern Ireland Consultation
Designing an e-consultation interface for ex-offenders
Designing a usability test
Designing a usability test of an e-consultation interface for ex-offenders
