Difference between revisions of "Diversity"
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
==[[Diversity: Consultation data generated]]== | ==[[Diversity: Consultation data generated]]== | ||
Two types of data was generated from | Two types of data was generated from | ||
| − | * Survey Data: This survey had eight-six week responses. It acted as a litmus test for how young people were being taught about diversity and conflict, and how they felt about diversity, and what actions they had taken or would like to take when difficulties were encountered dealing with difference. | + | * '''Survey Data''': This survey had eight-six week responses. It acted as a litmus test for how young people were being taught about diversity and conflict, and how they felt about diversity, and what actions they had taken or would like to take when difficulties were encountered dealing with difference. |
| − | * Participant Knowledge: Overall, the data suggested that encounters with diversity were interpreted as non-threatening cultural experiences wherein the young person expressed a sense of wonder and happiness with the differences they encountered. | + | * '''Participant Knowledge''': Overall, the data suggested that encounters with diversity were interpreted as non-threatening cultural experiences wherein the young person expressed a sense of wonder and happiness with the differences they encountered. |
==[[Diversity: Outcomes from the Test]]== | ==[[Diversity: Outcomes from the Test]]== | ||
Revision as of 21:21, 18 October 2007
Contents
Diversity Context
A key objective of the e-consultation research group is to develop e-consultation technologies to promote the concept of citizens participating in public policy discussions and debates.
The belief that using new technologies creatively can help citizens to get involved and this, in turn, helps policy makers keep informed of what the public think about important issues.
Each of the previous e-consultation experiments and trials, run by the team, had brought together people from different communities into the same virtual space to interact and exchange messages.
Diversity: Process and planning
The research team met and decided on a short time frame, i.e. six weeks, and the use of electronic technologies only.
The target participants were young people between 12-14 years old, targeted though the formal education system’s electronic infrastructure.
The team set out to make an electronic call for participation. Lots of thought went into the invitation, in particular the language, mood, presentation, and variety of participation methods.
The trial tools consisted of:
- An on-line survey
- An on-line exhibition of true stories of encounters with diversity
- An on-line discussion forum
Diversity: Experience of the consultees
There were three groups of feedback:
- Teachers felt the exercise contributed to the educational experience of students, illustrated democratic values, and improved IT skills.
- Youth Workers, who represented the young people, felt that young people were enthusiastic and felt that more young people could be included.
- Technologically, there were concerns. Both a deficiency in typing skills and schools' not having access to broadband were key issues.
Diversity: Consultation data generated
Two types of data was generated from
- Survey Data: This survey had eight-six week responses. It acted as a litmus test for how young people were being taught about diversity and conflict, and how they felt about diversity, and what actions they had taken or would like to take when difficulties were encountered dealing with difference.
- Participant Knowledge: Overall, the data suggested that encounters with diversity were interpreted as non-threatening cultural experiences wherein the young person expressed a sense of wonder and happiness with the differences they encountered.
