Difference between revisions of "NSEC E-Consultation Process and Planning"
From E-Consultation Guide
m (→Planning) |
m |
||
| (20 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | This page outlines how [http://www.nsec.info NSEC] began to plan the implementation of their [[NSEC E-Consultation Context#Developing and maintaining lines of communication|North-South Exchange programme]]. | ||
| + | |||
==Objective: A framework to manage the consultation complexity== | ==Objective: A framework to manage the consultation complexity== | ||
| − | The [http://www.e-consultation.org research team] worked alongside the [http://www.nsec.info NSEC] team. The agreement to formally work together was only arrived at after a fairly long period of discussion and clarification of the needs of both parties. A key research objective of the [http://www.nsec.info NSEC] trial was to develop an e-consultation framework that could mirror the complexity of the consultation objectives set out by [http://www.nsec.info NSEC]. | + | The [http://www.e-consultation.org research team] worked alongside the [http://www.nsec.info NSEC] team. The agreement to formally work together was only arrived at after a fairly long period of discussion and clarification of the needs of both parties. |
| + | |||
| + | A key research objective of the [http://www.nsec.info NSEC] trial was to develop an e-consultation framework that could mirror the complexity of the consultation objectives set out by [http://www.nsec.info NSEC]. | ||
====Underpinning different levels of Engagement==== | ====Underpinning different levels of Engagement==== | ||
| − | Rather than set out to achieve a single consultation exercise the [http://www.nsec.info NSEC] remit was to develop an e-consultation framework that was capable of underpinning different levels of engagement with a diverse number of stakeholders. On one hand, there was the policy arena, which concerned such issues as future development of [http://www.nsec.info/downloads.htm North South exchange programmes], and on the other, there was an ongoing need to evaluate existing exchange programmes in order to provide feedback to programme designers. | + | Rather than set out to achieve a single consultation exercise, the [http://www.nsec.info NSEC] remit was to develop an e-consultation framework that was capable of underpinning different levels of engagement with a diverse number of stakeholders. |
| + | |||
| + | On one hand, there was the '''policy arena''', which concerned such issues as future development of [http://www.nsec.info/downloads.htm North South exchange programmes], and on the other, there was an '''ongoing need to evaluate existing exchange programmes''' in order to provide feedback to programme designers. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The stakeholders most likely to be targeted in the trials were identified as: | ||
| + | *programme coordinators | ||
| + | *educational managers | ||
| + | *schoolteachers | ||
| + | *school children | ||
| − | + | [http://www.nsec.info NSEC] were interested in consulting with people who had participated in North South exchange programmes and those who had not. | |
==Key Issues== | ==Key Issues== | ||
In the series of meetings with [http://www.nsec.info NSEC], two key points worth noting arose: | In the series of meetings with [http://www.nsec.info NSEC], two key points worth noting arose: | ||
| − | + | # ''The need for a clear understanding of the consultation aims''. While the [http://www.nsec.info NSEC] brief was to consult widely, it was difficult to ensure that the aims of each individual consultation process were clarified. | |
| − | + | # ''The need for a clear understanding of the potential of available technologies''. The [http://www.nsec.info NSEC] management team had to attend several public forums and technology demonstrations before either party committed to a joint trial. | |
| − | |||
==Planning== | ==Planning== | ||
| Line 17: | Line 28: | ||
====Planning Process==== | ====Planning Process==== | ||
| − | The planning process can be viewed as a flow chart (thumbnail right). | + | The overall planning process can be viewed as a flow chart (thumbnail right). The planning and e-consultation development process steps are also summarised below:[[Image:NSEC_Planning_Process.png|right|thumb|Planning and Development Process Flow Chart]] |
| − | |||
| − | [[Image:NSEC_Planning_Process.png|right|thumb|Planning and Development Process Flow Chart]] | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
# Participants are selected | # Participants are selected | ||
| − | # Trialist attend | + | # [[Trialist]] attend technology demonstration |
| − | # | + | # Research team have formal meeting with NSEC. This led to initial definition of a problem |
| − | # The e-consultation research group responds to NSEC. Technologies and | + | # The e-consultation research group responds to NSEC. Technologies and processes are discussed. |
# NSEC outline clear consultation objectives: | # NSEC outline clear consultation objectives: | ||
| − | ##The Single | + | ##The Single Framework Programme (SFP) |
##An evaluation framework | ##An evaluation framework | ||
| − | ##Policy development and input from stakeholders' qualitative findings | + | ##Policy development and input from stakeholders' (qualitative) findings |
##The identification of best practice | ##The identification of best practice | ||
#Technologies are chosen: E-newsletter; online surveys; discussion forum; and, mailing list | #Technologies are chosen: E-newsletter; online surveys; discussion forum; and, mailing list | ||
| − | # | + | #Technologies are demonstrated |
| − | #Technology refinement cycle | + | #[[Technology refinement cycle]] |
| − | #Interim trial findings | + | #Interim trial findings produced. A 7 point revised e-consultation strategy is developed |
#E-consultation trial is revised | #E-consultation trial is revised | ||
| − | |||
====Planning Outcomes==== | ====Planning Outcomes==== | ||
| Line 44: | Line 50: | ||
It was agreed that the trial should focus on the following five objectives: | It was agreed that the trial should focus on the following five objectives: | ||
#To obtain stakeholders’ views on the Single Programme Framework (SPF) and to ask stakeholders if they believe its proscribed themes and criteria were correct. | #To obtain stakeholders’ views on the Single Programme Framework (SPF) and to ask stakeholders if they believe its proscribed themes and criteria were correct. | ||
| − | # | + | #To evaluate exchange programmes and to devise ways of optimising the benefits gained from these activities not only for the actual participants but also for the schools that were involved. |
| − | # | + | #To gather input from stakeholders (3,000 local groups and 18 management bodies) for policy development. |
| − | # | + | #To capture the attitudes and expectations of young people, teachers and youth workers. (This process had already started with the publication of the quality research study entitled [http://www.nsec.info/downloads.htm “In their own words”] by [http://www.nsec.info NSEC] and it was hoped to make this type of activity ongoing). |
| − | # | + | #To identify best practice. |
Latest revision as of 16:27, 21 September 2007
This page outlines how NSEC began to plan the implementation of their North-South Exchange programme.
Contents
Objective: A framework to manage the consultation complexity
The research team worked alongside the NSEC team. The agreement to formally work together was only arrived at after a fairly long period of discussion and clarification of the needs of both parties.
A key research objective of the NSEC trial was to develop an e-consultation framework that could mirror the complexity of the consultation objectives set out by NSEC.
Underpinning different levels of Engagement
Rather than set out to achieve a single consultation exercise, the NSEC remit was to develop an e-consultation framework that was capable of underpinning different levels of engagement with a diverse number of stakeholders.
On one hand, there was the policy arena, which concerned such issues as future development of North South exchange programmes, and on the other, there was an ongoing need to evaluate existing exchange programmes in order to provide feedback to programme designers.
The stakeholders most likely to be targeted in the trials were identified as:
- programme coordinators
- educational managers
- schoolteachers
- school children
NSEC were interested in consulting with people who had participated in North South exchange programmes and those who had not.
Key Issues
In the series of meetings with NSEC, two key points worth noting arose:
- The need for a clear understanding of the consultation aims. While the NSEC brief was to consult widely, it was difficult to ensure that the aims of each individual consultation process were clarified.
- The need for a clear understanding of the potential of available technologies. The NSEC management team had to attend several public forums and technology demonstrations before either party committed to a joint trial.
Planning
Following NSEC and the research team's agreement to formally work together, the planning phase began.
Planning Process
The overall planning process can be viewed as a flow chart (thumbnail right). The planning and e-consultation development process steps are also summarised below:
- Participants are selected
- Trialist attend technology demonstration
- Research team have formal meeting with NSEC. This led to initial definition of a problem
- The e-consultation research group responds to NSEC. Technologies and processes are discussed.
- NSEC outline clear consultation objectives:
- The Single Framework Programme (SFP)
- An evaluation framework
- Policy development and input from stakeholders' (qualitative) findings
- The identification of best practice
- Technologies are chosen: E-newsletter; online surveys; discussion forum; and, mailing list
- Technologies are demonstrated
- Technology refinement cycle
- Interim trial findings produced. A 7 point revised e-consultation strategy is developed
- E-consultation trial is revised
Planning Outcomes
The outcome of the planning phase was a list of the e-consultation objectives agreed by both NSEC and the research team.
It was agreed that the trial should focus on the following five objectives:
- To obtain stakeholders’ views on the Single Programme Framework (SPF) and to ask stakeholders if they believe its proscribed themes and criteria were correct.
- To evaluate exchange programmes and to devise ways of optimising the benefits gained from these activities not only for the actual participants but also for the schools that were involved.
- To gather input from stakeholders (3,000 local groups and 18 management bodies) for policy development.
- To capture the attitudes and expectations of young people, teachers and youth workers. (This process had already started with the publication of the quality research study entitled “In their own words” by NSEC and it was hoped to make this type of activity ongoing).
- To identify best practice.
